Environment

  • Alan.Guggenheim's picture

    Obama secret memo: land grab more than 10 million acres

    Courtesy of the Drudge Report: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/02/white-house-land-grab/

     

    DEMINT: White House land grab

    Proposal to seize land would favor animals over Americans

    MORE COMMENTARY STORIES

    Comments

    Post new comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
    • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

    More information about formatting options

    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    2 + 7 =
    Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
  • Suzanne.Guggenheim's picture

    Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995

     

    The academic at the centre of the ‘Climategate’ affair, whose raw data is crucial to the theory of climate change, has admitted that he has trouble ‘keeping track’ of the information.

    Colleagues say that the reason Professor Phil Jones has refused Freedom of Information requests is that he may have actually lost the relevant papers. 

    Professor Jones told the BBC yesterday there was truth in the observations of colleagues that he lacked organisational skills, that his office was swamped with piles of paper and that his record keeping is ‘not as good as it should be’.

    The data is crucial to the famous ‘hockey stick graph’ used by climate change advocates to support the theory.

    Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.

    And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.

    Comments

    Climate Change - population

    Crying "BS" about climate change and warming periods from, what, the year 1000? World population has expanded, just a bit, it seems. So, if you guys are pro-life, anti-environmentalist, anti-public-funding-for-anything, anti-immigration, etc, what kind of world are you seeing in 50 years? Seriously. I don't undertand how you can be pro-life, but don't see a need to plan for the energy needs of the future, whether the earth will be livable, the water drinkable, the air breathable. Warm is not the issue. The health of the planet is the issue. It's being polluted harshly by US, and by US, I mean mostly the United States and our consumer needs.

    Post new comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
    • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

    More information about formatting options

    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    3 + 0 =
    Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
  • Suzanne.Guggenheim's picture

    ANWR

    NOW, WHY DO YOU THINK THAT THE DEMOCRATS ARE LYING ABOUT ANWR?

    FIRST… do you know what ANWR is?
    ANWR = Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

    Comments

    Post new comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
    • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

    More information about formatting options

    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    5 + 8 =
    Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
  • Suzanne.Guggenheim's picture

    Greg Burton on Politics: How to solve the US Energy Crisis

    How to solve the US Energy Crisis

    I've had it.  Obama's new budget is partially being saved by Cap and Trade, one of the lamest bills any US Congress or President has ever concocted, beginning with its reasoning.  I am sick of this.  Why?  Because it's based on an incorrect premise, that A: Global Warming, or rather climate change in general, is mostly man-made, and B: Anything we do can stop or alter its course.

    Comments

    Post new comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
    • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

    More information about formatting options

    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    1 + 0 =
    Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
  • Comments

    Post new comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
    • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

    More information about formatting options

    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    4 + 12 =
    Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
  • Alan.Guggenheim's picture

    History Channel Runs Obama’s Propaganda

    Comments

    "Defending the scientific consensus from vested interests"

    From: Logical Science http://www.logicalscience.com/consensus/consensusD1.htm : "The number of climate scientists in the US can be found by examining the members of the American Geophysical Union (AGU). As of November 10, 2006 we know that there is a minimum (no official count of foreign climatologists is available) of 20,000 working climatologists worldwide 1,2. An important fact to remember is that many high profile critics you see in the news do not qualify as climate scientists when these standards are applied. Keep both of these concepts in mind the next time you see a handful of self proclaiming "climate scientists" with dissenting opinions. It is also important to note that Exxon Mobil is funding a $10,000 bounty for climate denialists and skeptics. If only 2% of the 20,000 climatologists were bought out then we'd have 400 deniers (skeptics are convinced by science not money}."

    Post new comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
    • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

    More information about formatting options

    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    8 + 6 =
    Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.