Environment
-
Comments
Climate Change - population
by Diva Deb (not verified) - 02/15/2010 - 1:59pmCrying "BS" about climate change and warming periods from, what, the year 1000? World population has expanded, just a bit, it seems. So, if you guys are pro-life, anti-environmentalist, anti-public-funding-for-anything, anti-immigration, etc, what kind of world are you seeing in 50 years? Seriously. I don't undertand how you can be pro-life, but don't see a need to plan for the energy needs of the future, whether the earth will be livable, the water drinkable, the air breathable. Warm is not the issue. The health of the planet is the issue. It's being polluted harshly by US, and by US, I mean mostly the United States and our consumer needs.
Post new comment
-
Comments
Post new comment
-
Comments
Post new comment
-
Comments
Post new comment
-
Comments
"Defending the scientific consensus from vested interests"
by C.L.L (not verified) - 03/06/2010 - 9:25pmFrom: Logical Science http://www.logicalscience.com/consensus/consensusD1.htm : "The number of climate scientists in the US can be found by examining the members of the American Geophysical Union (AGU). As of November 10, 2006 we know that there is a minimum (no official count of foreign climatologists is available) of 20,000 working climatologists worldwide 1,2. An important fact to remember is that many high profile critics you see in the news do not qualify as climate scientists when these standards are applied. Keep both of these concepts in mind the next time you see a handful of self proclaiming "climate scientists" with dissenting opinions. It is also important to note that Exxon Mobil is funding a $10,000 bounty for climate denialists and skeptics. If only 2% of the 20,000 climatologists were bought out then we'd have 400 deniers (skeptics are convinced by science not money}."
Post new comment



Comments
Post new comment